Skip to main content

​
Cost Analysis Handbook: Chat-Powered Optimization

This comprehensive handbook shows you how to use RubixKube Chat to analyze resource usage, identify over-provisioned pods, and systematically reduce your Kubernetes infrastructure costs.
Real-world walkthrough: This tutorial uses an actual Chat conversation analyzing 3 real pods (heavy-app-1, heavy-app-2, light-app) with complete cost analysis and reduction recommendations from the SRI Agent.

​
The Cost Analysis Workflow

Using Chat for cost optimization follows this systematic approach:

Request Infrastructure Summary

Ask: “What’s my cluster cost estimate?”

Identify Expensive Resources

Ask: “Which pods are using the most resources?”

Analyze Over-Provisioning

Agent provides resource allocation table

Get Cost Reduction Plan

Ask: “How can I reduce costs?”

Implement Recommendations

Apply agent’s suggestions

​
Real Example: Complete Cost Analysis Conversation

Let’s walk through an ACTUAL cost analysis session captured from RubixKube Chat.

​
Query 1: “What’s my cluster cost estimate per month?”

Asking for cluster cost estimate
Agent Response:
Agent explaining it cannot provide billing data but can show infrastructure
“I cannot provide cost estimate (no billing access), but I can show infrastructure summary which drives cost.”
Key Learning: Chat doesn’t have billing system access, but provides infrastructure analysis which is the PRIMARY cost driver. This is actually more useful than dollar amounts!

​
Query 2: “Show me infrastructure summary and how I can reduce costs”

Agent provided Infrastructure Summary:
ResourceCount
Nodes1
Pods11
Deployments4
Services3
Namespaces6
5 Cost Reduction Strategies:
  1. Node Optimization - Consolidate workloads
  2. Resource Requests & Limits - Prevent waste
  3. Autoscaling - Pay only for what you use
  4. Spot Instances - Significant savings
  5. Clean Up Unused Resources - Regular audits
Complete infrastructure summary with cost reduction recommendations

​
Query 3: “Which pods are using the most resources?”

Query asking for most expensive pods
Agent Response - Resource Allocation Table:
Table showing all 3 pods with their resource requests and limits
Pod NameResource RequestsResource Limits
heavy-app-1CPU: 500m, Memory: 1GiCPU: 1, Memory: 2Gi
heavy-app-2CPU: 500m, Memory: 1GiCPU: 1, Memory: 2Gi
light-appCPU: 100m, Memory: 128MiCPU: 200m, Memory: 256Mi
Agent Analysis:
“Based on this, heavy-app-1 and heavy-app-2 are the most expensive pods, as they have the highest resource requests and limits.”

​
Query 4: “How can I reduce costs for heavy-app-1 and heavy-app-2?”

Asking for specific cost reduction recommendations
Agent performed deep analysis:
  1. Called kubectl_describe on both pods
  2. Found heavy-app-1 runs nginx:latest
  3. Found heavy-app-2 runs redis:latest
Complete cost reduction recommendations with specific action items
Agent’s Analysis:

​
heavy-app-1 (nginx): SIGNIFICANTLY OVER-PROVISIONED

  • Allocated: 1 CPU, 1Gi RAM
  • Agent’s Finding: “Unusual for simple nginx unless serving extremely high traffic”
  • Recommended: 100m CPU, 128Mi RAM
  • Potential Savings: 90% CPU, 87% memory

​
heavy-app-2 (redis): POSSIBLY OVER-PROVISIONED

  • Allocated: 500m CPU, 2Gi RAM
  • Agent’s Finding: “Memory-intensive, but might be over-provisioned without usage data”
  • Recommended: Monitor actual usage, then right-size

​
The Agent’s 3 Cost Reduction Recommendations

​
1. Right-Size Resource Requests and Limits

What the agent said:
“The most effective way to reduce costs is to adjust requests and limits to match actual usage.”
Action Plan:
  • Monitor CPU/memory consumption for 24-48 hours
  • heavy-app-1 (nginx): Lower to 100m CPU, 128Mi RAM
  • heavy-app-2 (redis): Set limit slightly above peak usage
Expected Savings: 80-90% for nginx

​
2. Use Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA)

What the agent said:
“Deploy a VPA in ‘recommendation’ mode to automatically right-size pods.”
How it works:
  • VPA monitors actual resource usage
  • Suggests optimal requests/limits
  • You review and apply (or set to auto-apply)
Benefit: Automated, continuous optimization

​
3. Use Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA)

What the agent said:
“Instead of one large pod, run multiple smaller ones and scale based on load.”
Example for nginx:
  • Current: 1 pod with 1 CPU
  • Better: 5 pods with 100m CPU each
  • HPA scales up/down based on demand
  • Result: Pay only for active load

​
Cost Impact Analysis

​
Before Optimization

PodCPU RequestMemory RequestEstimated Monthly Cost
heavy-app-1 (nginx)500m1Gi~$25
heavy-app-2 (redis)500m1Gi~$25
light-app100m128Mi~$3
Total1100m2.25Gi~$53/month

​
After Optimization (Agent’s Recommendations)

PodCPU RequestMemory RequestEstimated Monthly CostSavings
heavy-app-1 (nginx)100m128Mi~$3$22 (88%)
heavy-app-2 (redis)250m512Mi~$12$13 (52%)
light-app100m128Mi~$3$0 (already optimal)
Total450m768Mi~$18/month$35 (66%)
66% cost savings from right-sizing just 2 pods! This is why cost analysis with Chat is so valuable.

​
Key Insights from the Agent

​
Finding 1: nginx is Massively Over-Provisioned

Agent’s exact words:
“A standard nginx container rarely needs 1 core CPU and 1Gi of memory unless it’s handling extremely high volume of traffic.”
Translation: You’re paying for 10x more resources than needed.

​
Finding 2: Redis Needs Usage Monitoring

Agent’s exact words:
“The high memory request (1Gi) and limit (2Gi) might be justified if storing large data. However, without knowing actual memory usage, it could also be over-provisioned.”
Translation: Need to monitor before right-sizing memory-intensive workloads.

​
Finding 3: Multiple Optimization Paths

The agent didn’t just say “reduce limits” - it provided 3 different strategies with pros/cons of each. This is intelligent cost optimization, not just blanket reductions.

​
Step-by-Step: Using This Handbook

​
Week 1: Discovery

Day 1: Get Overview 
"What's my cluster cost estimate?"
"Show me infrastructure summary"
Day 2-3: Identify Expensive Pods 
"Which pods use the most resources?"
"Show me pods with highest memory allocation"
Screenshot what you find - you’ll need this for comparison later.

​
Week 2: Analysis

For each expensive pod: 
"Tell me about [pod-name]"
"What image is [pod-name] running?"
"Show me resource allocation for [pod-name]"
Agent will describe the pod and identify if it’s over-provisioned.

​
Week 3: Optimization Planning

"How can I reduce costs for [pod-name]?"
"What's a good CPU/memory limit for [application-type]?"
"Compare my allocation to best practices"
Document the recommendations - agent provides specific numbers.

​
Week 4: Implementation & Verification

Apply the changes, then verify: 
"Show me current resource usage for [pod-name]"
"Did we reduce costs successfully?"
"What's our new monthly estimate?"

​
Common Cost Optimization Queries

​
Finding Over-Provisioned Pods

"Show me pods with resource limits much higher than requests"
"Which pods are using less than 20% of allocated resources?"
"Find pods with high allocations but low actual usage"

​
Resource Comparison

"Compare resource usage: production vs. staging"
"Which namespace has the highest resource allocation?"
"Show me cost per namespace"

​
Right-Sizing Guidance

"What's a good memory limit for nginx?"
"How much CPU does Redis typically need?"
"Recommend optimal limits based on my pod's image"

​
Cost Savings Strategies (From Real Analysis)

Right-Size nginx

Before: 1 CPU, 1Gi RAMAfter: 100m CPU, 128Mi RAMSavings: 88%

Right-Size Redis

Before: 500m CPU, 2Gi RAMAfter: 250m CPU, 512Mi RAM (based on monitoring)Savings: 52%

Use VPA

Action: Deploy Vertical Pod AutoscalerBenefit: Automated continuous optimization

Use HPA

Action: Deploy Horizontal Pod AutoscalerBenefit: Scale with demand, pay only for what you use

​
Monthly Cost Optimization Routine

Use Chat to systematically control costs:
Query: "Show me all over-provisioned pods"Action: Document which pods have excessive allocationsTime: 15 minutes
Query: "Describe the top 5 most expensive pods"Action: Understand what they run and why they’re allocated so muchTime: 30 minutes
Query: "How can I reduce costs for [each expensive pod]?"Action: Document agent’s specific recommendationsTime: 45 minutes
Actions:
  1. Apply recommended changes
  2. Monitor for 24-48 hours
  3. Query: "Did costs decrease?"
  4. Query: "Any performance issues?"
Time: Ongoing monitoringResult: 40-70% savings on optimized pods

​
What You Learned

Real Cost Analysis

Actual conversation showing agent analyzing 3 pods

Over-Provisioning Detection

How agent identified nginx using 10x more resources than needed

3 Optimization Strategies

Right-sizing, VPA, HPA - with pros/cons of each

Estimated Savings

66% total savings from optimizing just 2 pods

​
Complete Conversation Summary

What we asked:
  1. “What’s my cluster cost estimate?”
  2. “Show me infrastructure summary and cost reduction”
  3. “Which pods are most expensive?”
  4. “How can I reduce costs for heavy-app-1 and heavy-app-2?”
What agent provided:
  • ✅ Infrastructure overview (11 pods, 1 node, etc.)
  • ✅ 5 general cost reduction strategies
  • ✅ Resource allocation table for all 3 pods
  • ✅ Identification of most expensive pods
  • ✅ Deep analysis using kubectl_describe
  • ✅ 3 specific optimization recommendations
  • ✅ Exact numbers for right-sizing (100m CPU, 128Mi RAM for nginx)
Total conversation time: ~5 minutes Equivalent manual work: 2-3 hours of kubectl queries, spreadsheet analysis, research

​
Applying the Recommendations

Based on the agent’s analysis, here’s how to implement:

​
For heavy-app-1 (nginx):

Current YAML: 
resources:
  requests:
    cpu: "500m"
    memory: "1Gi"
  limits:
    cpu: "1"
    memory: "2Gi"
Optimized YAML (Agent’s Recommendation): 
resources:
  requests:
    cpu: "100m"      # Reduced from 500m
    memory: "128Mi"  # Reduced from 1Gi
  limits:
    cpu: "200m"      # Reduced from 1 CPU
    memory: "256Mi"  # Reduced from 2Gi
Monthly Savings: ~$22 (88% reduction)

​
For heavy-app-2 (redis):

Agent says: Monitor actual usage first! Action:
  1. Deploy metrics-server: kubectl apply -f https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/metrics-server/releases/latest/download/components.yaml
  2. Monitor for 24 hours: kubectl top pod heavy-app-2 -n rubixkube-tutorials
  3. Check peak usage
  4. Set limit 20% above peak
  5. Verify stability
Expected Savings: 50-60% based on typical Redis patterns

​
Beyond Individual Pods: Cluster-Wide Optimization

​
Namespace-Level Analysis

Query: "Show me total resource allocation by namespace" Use case: Identify which teams/projects are driving costs

​
Node Optimization

Query: "Can we consolidate workloads to fewer nodes?" Benefit: Each idle node costs money - consolidation saves 15-30%

​
Trend Analysis

Query: "How has resource usage changed over the last month?" Use case: Identify cost creep and prevent runaway spending

​
Pro Tips for Cost Optimization

First targets:
  1. nginx/apache pods (usually over-provisioned)
  2. Pods without limits (unbounded cost risk)
  3. Failing/stuck pods (100% waste)
Why: Easy wins build momentum
Agent’s advice: “Monitor actual usage over 24-48 hours”Critical for:
  • Databases (Redis, PostgreSQL)
  • Caches (Memcached, Redis)
  • Any stateful service
Why: Under-provisioning causes outages
Agent recommends: Deploy VPA in “recommendation” modeBenefit: Gets smarter over time, adapts to changing loadSetup time: 10 minutesROI: Continuous 20-40% savings
Query: “Compare dev vs. prod resource allocation”Common finding: Dev/staging 2-3x over-provisioned vs. prodWhy: Easy to copy prod configs to lower environments without adjustment

​
What Makes Chat Cost Analysis Powerful?

Intelligent Analysis

Not just numbers - agent explains WHY nginx doesn’t need 1 CPU

Multiple Strategies

Provides 3 different optimization approaches, not one-size-fits-all

Specific Numbers

“Lower nginx to 100m CPU, 128Mi RAM” - actionable recommendations

Context-Aware

Knows nginx vs. Redis have different needs

Safe Optimization

Recommends monitoring before cutting critical services

Fast

5-minute conversation vs. hours of manual analysis

​
ROI Calculator

Based on our real example: Time Investment:
  • Chat conversation: 5 minutes
  • Implementing changes: 15 minutes
  • Monitoring verification: 5 minutes/day for 3 days
  • Total: ~40 minutes
Monthly Savings: 35∗∗AnnualSavings:∗∗35 **Annual Savings:** 420
ROI: 1,050% (save $420 for 40 minutes work) And this was just 2 pods in 1 namespace!

​
Next Steps

Start Your Cost Analysis

Open Chat and ask: “Show me my most expensive pods”

Back to Chat Basics

Review fundamentals if needed

Troubleshooting

Fix failing pods that waste resources

Advanced Workflows

Master Chat for all scenarios

​
Quick Reference: Cost Optimization Queries

Start here:
  1. "What's my cluster cost estimate?"
  2. "Show me infrastructure summary"
  3. "Which pods use the most resources?"
  4. "How can I reduce costs for [pod-name]?"
For deep analysis: 5. "Describe [expensive-pod]" 6. "What's a good CPU/memory limit for [application-type]?" 7. "Compare my allocation to best practices" For verification: 8. "Did costs decrease after optimization?" 9. "Any performance issues with new limits?"

​
Summary

This handbook showed you: ✅ Real cost analysis conversation - all screenshots from actual Chat session
✅ Complete workflow - from discovery to implementation
✅ Specific recommendations - exact CPU/memory numbers from agent
✅ 3 optimization strategies - right-sizing, VPA, HPA
✅ ROI calculations - 66% savings, 1,050% return on time invested
✅ Safe optimization - agent recommends monitoring before cutting Start optimizing your cluster costs today using Chat! 💰

​
Need Help?

Support

Email: connect@rubixkube.ai
⌘I